English Premier League Table 2026-27

Built from synced FPL fixtures plus live Fantasy Premier League results. For prior seasons stored in SQLite, configure the environment variable APISPORTS_KEY (api-sports.io / API‑Football) and reload or use Refresh API data.

Sort: rank (asc)

# Team GP W D L F A GD P Commentary
1 Man City 2 2 0 0 6 2 +4 6 MCI are among the richest attacks (6 goals, +1 vs MUN on 5). MCI defend tightly (2 GA; 1 fewer than BOU on 3). Heavy scoring beside a disciplined GA line is textbook control football with efficient finishing pockets.
2 Arsenal 2 2 0 0 4 0 +4 6 ARS defend tightly (0 GA; 1 fewer than BRE on 1). ARS sit 2nd on 6 points (4 for, 0 against; +4 GD). They sit inside the illustrative Champions berth band. They generate 2.00 goals/game and concede 0.00 goals/game
3 Hull City 2 2 0 0 3 0 +3 6 HUL defend tightly (0 GA; 1 fewer than BRE on 1). HUL sit 3rd on 6 points (3 for, 0 against; +3 GD). They sit inside the illustrative Champions berth band. They generate 1.50 goals/game and concede 0.00 goals/game
4 Chelsea 2 2 0 0 7 5 +2 6 CHE are among the richest attacks (7 goals, +1 vs MCI on 6). CHE concede sharply (5 GA; 5th-leakiest defence column)—1 more goals leaked than BHA (4 against). Goals flow at both ends, so swings stay live late when set-piece workloads pile up.
5 Brentford 2 1 1 0 4 1 +3 4 BRE defend tightly (1 GA; 1 fewer than MCI on 2). BRE sit 5th on 4 points (4 for, 1 against; +3 GD). They sit inside the illustrative Champions berth band. They generate 2.00 goals/game and concede 0.50 goals/game
6 Newcastle 2 1 1 0 4 2 +2 4 NEW sit 6th on 4 points (4 for, 2 against; +2 GD). They hover near the illustrative European cutoff band. They generate 2.00 goals/game and concede 1.00 goals/game
7 Everton 2 1 1 0 3 1 +2 4 EVE defend tightly (1 GA; 1 fewer than MCI on 2). EVE sit 7th on 4 points (3 for, 1 against; +2 GD). They hover near the illustrative European cutoff band. They generate 1.50 goals/game and concede 0.50 goals/game
8 Leeds 2 1 1 0 2 1 +1 4 LEE are 5th-lowest for goals scored (2 GF)—1 behind HUL (3). LEE defend tightly (1 GA; 1 fewer than MCI on 2). Points often ride on slender margins: few goals scored but also few shipped.
9 Brighton 2 1 0 1 7 4 +3 3 BHA are among the richest attacks (7 goals, +1 vs MCI on 6). BHA sit 9th on 3 points (7 for, 4 against; +3 GD). They generate 3.50 goals/game and concede 2.00 goals/game
10 Man Utd 2 1 0 1 5 4 +1 3 MUN are among the richest attacks (5 goals, +1 vs LIV on 4). MUN sit 10th on 3 points (5 for, 4 against; +1 GD). They generate 2.50 goals/game and concede 2.00 goals/game
11 Sunderland 2 1 0 1 2 2 0 3 SUN are 6th-lowest for goals scored (2 GF)—1 behind HUL (3). SUN sit 11th on 3 points (2 for, 2 against; +0 GD). They generate 1.00 goals/game and concede 1.00 goals/game
12 Ipswich Town 2 1 0 1 4 6 -2 3 IPS are among the richest attacks (4 goals, +1 vs EVE on 3). CRY and IPS leak the joint-most goals (6 GA). CHE sit next-best with 5 conceded (1 fewer against). Goals flow at both ends, so swings stay live late when set-piece workloads pile up.
13 Liverpool 2 0 2 0 4 4 0 2 LIV are among the richest attacks (4 goals, +1 vs EVE on 3). LIV sit 13th on 2 points (4 for, 4 against; +0 GD). They generate 2.00 goals/game and concede 2.00 goals/game
14 Bournemouth 2 0 1 1 2 3 -1 1 BOU sit 14th on 1 points (2 for, 3 against; -1 GD). They generate 1.00 goals/game and concede 1.50 goals/game
15 Nott'm Forest 2 0 1 1 2 3 -1 1 NFO sit 15th on 1 points (2 for, 3 against; -1 GD). They generate 1.00 goals/game and concede 1.50 goals/game
16 Fulham 2 0 0 2 2 4 -2 0 FUL sit 16th on 0 points (2 for, 4 against; -2 GD). They generate 1.00 goals/game and concede 2.00 goals/game
17 Coventry City 2 0 0 2 0 4 -4 0 AVL, COV, and TOT share the weakest attack (0 goals from 2 played). Next rung up is CRY with 1 goals (1 more). COV concede sharply (4 GA; 6th-leakiest defence column)—1 more goals leaked than BOU (3 against). That combination—a blunt attack and leaky defence—usually means decisive moments arrive early once they chase the score.
18 Crystal Palace 2 0 0 2 1 6 -5 0 CRY are 4th-lowest for goals scored (1 GF)—1 behind LEE (2). CRY and IPS leak the joint-most goals (6 GA). CHE sit next-best with 5 conceded (1 fewer against). That combination—a blunt attack and leaky defence—usually means decisive moments arrive early once they chase the score.
19 Aston Villa 2 0 0 2 0 5 -5 0 AVL, COV, and TOT share the weakest attack (0 goals from 2 played). Next rung up is CRY with 1 goals (1 more). AVL concede sharply (5 GA; 3rd-leakiest defence column)—1 more goals leaked than BHA (4 against). That combination—a blunt attack and leaky defence—usually means decisive moments arrive early once they chase the score.
20 Spurs 2 0 0 2 0 5 -5 0 AVL, COV, and TOT share the weakest attack (0 goals from 2 played). Next rung up is CRY with 1 goals (1 more). TOT concede sharply (5 GA; 4th-leakiest defence column)—1 more goals leaked than BHA (4 against). That combination—a blunt attack and leaky defence—usually means decisive moments arrive early once they chase the score.

1–5: Champions League 6: Europa League 7: Conference League playoff 18–20: Relegation Commentary is generated only from headline goals-for/against totals and illustrative zone stripes—fixture difficulty splits are not analysed. For entertainment and discussion only, not wagering advice. Bands follow a typical UEFA coefficient layout and do not update when competition rules change mid-season.