Gameweek hauls
Every player at or above your minimum fantasy points threshold for each gameweek (synced DB + live bootstrap for names).
Where we find a fixture: opponent, official FPL fixture difficulty on that side (1– easiest / 5– hardest), optional Fix imports for attack/defence matchup ratings, scoreline overlay from FPL fixtures, plus ICT / Form captured in the synced GW row.
Historical data last stored: 2026-09-02 16:04:20 · rows in DB this season: 1236.
Showing all qualifying hauls across gameweeks. Default table sort: points high to low, then newer gameweek first when ties. Click any column heading to re-sort (DataTables). Use the search box below the headers for quick text scans on the rows on this page.
Commentary compares the score to the ridge GW model (same family as the Players tab) using lags, minutes, official FDR, plus synced ICT/Form as extra context — not bookmaker odds.
| GW | # | Player | Pos | Team | Score | vs | FPL FDR | FDR atk | FDR def | GW signal (ICT) | Pts | Mins M | G | A | CS | £ (GW) | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | B.Fernandes | MID |
TOT
|
0–2 | NEW | 2 | — | — | 26.10 | 23 | 90 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12.0 | Far above naive GW XP (~3.48 pts) even after a plush fixture (lag + minutes weighted), so icing on the cake rather than sneakiness. Involvement read: ICT 26.10. |
| 2 | 2 | Cherki | MID |
MCI
|
1–4 | CRY | 3 | — | — | 17.20 | 14 | 81 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7.7 | Comfortably beats pre-GW ridge XP (~2.52 forecast vs 14.0 actual) — clear upside versus the calibrated lag/FDR/minutes signal. Involvement read: ICT 17.20. |
| 2 | 5 | Haaland | FWD |
MCI
|
1–4 | CRY | 3 | — | — | 12.00 | 13 | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15.5 | Comfortably beats pre-GW ridge XP (~2.72 forecast vs 13.0 actual) — clear upside versus the calibrated lag/FDR/minutes signal. Involvement read: ICT 12.00. |
| 2 | 4 | Groß | MID |
BHA
|
4–3 | CHE | 4 | — | — | 10.40 | 13 | 90 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5.5 | Comfortably beats pre-GW ridge XP (~3.23 forecast vs 13.0 actual) — clear upside versus the calibrated lag/FDR/minutes signal. Involvement read: ICT 10.40. |
| 2 | 3 | Gibbs-White | MID |
NFO
|
2–2 | LIV | 4 | — | — | 8.60 | 13 | 90 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7.9 | Comfortably beats pre-GW ridge XP (~3.23 forecast vs 13.0 actual) — clear upside versus the calibrated lag/FDR/minutes signal. Involvement read: ICT 8.60. |
| 2 | 7 | Tarkowski | DEF |
EVE
|
1–1 | BOU | 3 | — | — | 8.50 | 12 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 | Comfortably beats pre-GW ridge XP (~3.13 forecast vs 12.0 actual) — clear upside versus the calibrated lag/FDR/minutes signal. Involvement read: ICT 8.50. |
| 2 | 6 | Scott | MID |
BOU
|
1–1 | EVE | 3 | — | — | 10.10 | 12 | 86 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6.0 | Comfortably beats pre-GW ridge XP (~3.36 forecast vs 12.0 actual) — clear upside versus the calibrated lag/FDR/minutes signal. Involvement read: ICT 10.10. |
| 2 | 12 | Saka | MID |
ARS
|
0–1 | AVL | 4 | — | — | 9.30 | 11 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9.5 | Above GW ridge XP (≈3.7) by +7.30 pts — strong but still somewhat tethered to the model context (testing on the official fixture scale). Involvement read: ICT 9.30. |
| 2 | 9 | Dedić | DEF |
NEW
|
0–2 | TOT | 3 | — | — | 7.30 | 11 | 90 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.5 | Comfortably beats pre-GW ridge XP (~2.4 forecast vs 11.0 actual) — clear upside versus the calibrated lag/FDR/minutes signal. Involvement read: ICT 7.30. |
| 2 | 10 | Hall | DEF |
NEW
|
0–2 | TOT | 3 | — | — | 7.00 | 11 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5.1 | Comfortably beats pre-GW ridge XP (~2.7 forecast vs 11.0 actual) — clear upside versus the calibrated lag/FDR/minutes signal. Involvement read: ICT 7.00. |
| 2 | 11 | Mbeumo | MID |
MUN
|
5–2 | IPS | 2 | — | — | 12.40 | 11 | 90 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8.0 | Above GW ridge XP (≈3.48) by +7.52 pts — strong but still somewhat tethered to the model context (very kind on the official fixture scale). Involvement read: ICT 12.40. |
| 2 | 8 | Calafiori | DEF |
ARS
|
0–1 | AVL | 4 | — | — | 4.20 | 11 | 90 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5.6 | Above GW ridge XP (≈3.14) by +7.86 pts — strong but still somewhat tethered to the model context (testing on the official fixture scale). Involvement read: ICT 4.20. |
| 2 | 14 | Tzolakis | GKP |
HUL
|
0–1 | COV | 2 | — | — | 2.60 | 10 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.5 | Roughly in line with ridge XP (5.52 forecast vs 10.0 actual; very kind on the official fixture scale) — walk-forward GW model broadly vindicated. Involvement read: ICT 2.60. |
| 2 | 13 | Schade | MID |
BRE
|
1–1 | LEE | 3 | — | — | 9.10 | 10 | 87 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 | Above GW ridge XP (≈3.51) by +6.49 pts — strong but still somewhat tethered to the model context (average on the official fixture scale). Involvement read: ICT 9.10. |
| 1 | 1 | De Cuyper | DEF |
BHA
|
4–0 | AVL | 3 | — | — | 12.90 | 17 | 77 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.7 | GW1 haul — average on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 12.90. |
| 1 | 2 | Hinshelwood | MID |
BHA
|
4–0 | AVL | 3 | — | — | 14.50 | 16 | 63 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6.0 | GW1 haul — average on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 14.50. |
| 1 | 3 | Mendy | DEF |
HUL
|
2–0 | MUN | 4 | — | — | 8.50 | 15 | 63 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.0 | GW1 haul — testing on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 8.50. |
| 1 | 5 | M.Sangaré | MID |
BRE
|
3–0 | TOT | 3 | — | — | 7.40 | 14 | 75 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5.7 | GW1 haul — average on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 7.40. |
| 1 | 4 | Ajayi | DEF |
HUL
|
2–0 | MUN | 4 | — | — | 7.90 | 14 | 63 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.1 | GW1 haul — testing on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 7.90. |
| 1 | 8 | Stach | MID |
LEE
|
0–1 | NFO | 3 | — | — | 6.60 | 13 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6.0 | GW1 haul — average on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 6.60. |
| 1 | 7 | Palmer | MID |
CHE
|
2–3 | FUL | 3 | — | — | 16.10 | 13 | 82 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.6 | GW1 haul — average on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 16.10. |
| 1 | 6 | Kayode | DEF |
BRE
|
3–0 | TOT | 3 | — | — | 8.10 | 13 | 75 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.6 | GW1 haul — average on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 8.10. |
| 1 | 9 | Gakpo | MID |
LIV
|
2–2 | NEW | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11.50 | 12 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7.0 | GW1 haul — average on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 11.50. |
| 1 | 12 | White | DEF |
ARS
|
3–0 | COV | 2 | — | — | 7.30 | 11 | 90 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5.5 | GW1 haul — very kind on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 7.30. |
| 1 | 11 | João Pedro | FWD |
CHE
|
2–3 | FUL | 3 | — | — | 11.10 | 11 | 90 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7.7 | GW1 haul — average on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 11.10. |
| 1 | 10 | Dewsbury-Hall | MID |
EVE
|
2–0 | CRY | 3 | — | — | 9.80 | 11 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6.5 | GW1 haul — average on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 9.80. |
| 1 | 13 | Ødegaard | MID |
ARS
|
3–0 | COV | 2 | — | — | 12.30 | 11 | 75 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6.6 | GW1 haul — very kind on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 12.30. |
| 1 | 18 | Tavernier | MID |
BOU
|
2–1 | MCI | 5 | — | — | 7.50 | 10 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 | GW1 haul — testing on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 7.50. |
| 1 | 19 | Tzolakis | GKP |
HUL
|
2–0 | MUN | 4 | — | — | 3.50 | 10 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.5 | GW1 haul — testing on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 3.50. |
| 1 | 17 | Lewis-Potter | MID |
BRE
|
3–0 | TOT | 3 | — | — | 8.20 | 10 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5.5 | GW1 haul — average on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 8.20. |
| 1 | 16 | Justin | DEF |
LEE
|
0–1 | NFO | 3 | — | — | 2.90 | 10 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.5 | GW1 haul — average on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 2.90. |
| 1 | 14 | Bijol | DEF |
LEE
|
0–1 | NFO | 3 | — | — | 3.90 | 10 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5.0 | GW1 haul — average on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 3.90. |
| 1 | 15 | Guéhi | DEF |
MCI
|
2–1 | BOU | 3 | — | — | 8.90 | 10 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 | GW1 haul — average on the official fixture scale.GW1 has almost no usable lag history inside this ridge model (first round of returns). Compare with fixture difficulty only. Involvement read: ICT 8.90. |
Typing in the Data Tables search box filters both the rows and the scatter; the chart updates whenever the table redraws.
Scatter uses rows that match active Data Tables filters. Same gameweek and points use one dot; open the tooltip to see every player in that bucket side by side.